A STRATZ alternative for Dota 2 teams, rosters, schedules, and product UIs.
STRATZ is deep and GraphQL-heavy. Cito API is the simpler REST path for Dota 2 apps that need live matches, rosters, tournaments, player rows, and radar outputs quickly.
No sales call. No contract. Start with 500 free requests/month, then upgrade when you need production volume.
Live API data sample
4nalog
HEROIC · mid · Puck
Player radar
Hover points for percentile scores
Player match row
/player-statsKDA
7.33
GPM
642
XPM
781
LH@10
82
Hero DMG
28,640
Tower DMG
1,460
1win Essence
Game 14nalog
HEROIC · Puck
Lelis
HEROIC · Clockwerk
Davai Lama
Nigma Galaxy · Axe
Endpoint behind the sample
/api/v1/dota2/players/295547/radar?role=mid&window=90dPrefer REST over GraphQL?
Cito gives Dota builders endpoint-first REST paths for the screens they already know they need.
STRATZ comparison
A simpler Dota API path for apps that do not need deep GraphQL
STRATZ is powerful for deep Dota analytics. Cito focuses on product-ready REST endpoints for teams, rosters, matches, tournaments, bots, and profiles.
REST endpoints
STRATZ alternative endpoints for shipping faster
Use these when your app needs a predictable URL for each product screen.
/api/v1/dota2/matches/liveLive Dota 2 matches for bots and dashboards.
/api/v1/dota2/teams/{teamId}/statsTeam-level win rate and enriched row counts.
/api/v1/dota2/teams/{teamId}/rosterTeam roster data for current team pages.
/api/v1/dota2/players/{playerId}/heroesPlayer hero pool and hero history rows.
/api/v1/dota2/leaderboards/kdaMetric leaderboards without a custom GraphQL query.
/api/v1/dota2/tournaments/{tournamentId}/matchesEvent match lists for tournament hubs.
Why use Cito
Where Cito beats a deep analytics platform for app teams
Fast integrations
Drop REST endpoints into bots, dashboards, and backend jobs quickly.
AI coding workflows
Give coding agents direct endpoint URLs and fewer schema decisions.
Team pages
Build pages around rosters, recent matches, rankings, and radar cards.
Event products
Render tournament pages with teams, matches, status, and prize pool context.
Fantasy tools
Use player rows, leaderboards, hero pools, and radar scores as scoring inputs.
Supportable apps
Use Cito when you want a vendor accountable to small builders and paid users.
Page cluster
Dota 2 API pages built to rank together
Each page targets a specific search intent and links to the rest of the cluster.
Start free
Use REST endpoints from day one.
Create a free key, test Cito REST payloads, and upgrade when your Dota product needs more request volume.
Self-serve
Start testing without a sales call, demo meeting, or enterprise contract.
Builder-first
Endpoints for bots, fantasy tools, dashboards, match centers, and player pages.
Normalized
REST JSON fields shaped for product screens, not just raw source dumps.
STRATZ API Alternative FAQ
Is Cito better than STRATZ?
Cito is better for developers who want simple REST endpoints for Dota product screens. STRATZ remains a strong option for deep free GraphQL-driven Dota analytics.
Does Cito require GraphQL?
No. Cito Dota endpoints are REST JSON endpoints under /api/v1/dota2.
What Cito endpoints replace common STRATZ use cases?
Use matches, teams, team roster, player heroes, player stats, leaderboards, tournaments, and radar endpoints depending on the screen you are building.
Who should use this page?
Developers building bots, public dashboards, match centers, tournament hubs, and fantasy tools who want direct endpoints instead of a broad GraphQL layer.
Deep analytics are useful. Direct product endpoints ship faster.
Use Cito API for Dota screens that need matches, rosters, tournaments, players, leaderboards, and radar outputs through simple REST.